<incom> OOXML and the Politics of Standardization
Anriette Esterhuysen
anriette at apc.org
Mon Sep 10 10:32:52 CEST 2007
Soenke
I had a similar thought.
What I found most disturbing about this OOXML vote is
how it 'sneaked' up on most people.
In fact... the politics of standardisation, and ensuring open
standards is more fundamental to A2K, and easier to
defend, than open source.
Anriette
> Now that ISO is now being drawn into a politics-of-standardization
> debate, not unlike WIPO (which until very recently no-one outside
> expertist circles knew much about) and the controversy regarding a
> possible 'development mandate' etc., I wonder if this is sth that
> could also be addressed in the context of the Access-to-Knowledge
> campaign; I am not sure to what extent that A2K is still alive (the
> list is, but is the campaign?), or whether it even addresses the role
> played by standardization bodies.
>
> As far as lists go, the one started by Norbert Bollow seems to
> coordinate some of the activities between now and the Feb 2008 ISO
> meeting,
>
> <http://openiso.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
>
> Soenke
> _______________________________________________
> incom-l mailing list
> incom-l at incommunicado.info
> http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/incom-l
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.12/997 - Release Date:
> 9/9/2007 10:17 AM
>
------------------------------------------------------
Anriette Esterhuysen, Executive Director
Association for Progressive Communications
anriette at apc.org
http://www.apc.org
PO Box 29755, Melville, South Africa. 2109
Tel. 27 11 726 1692
Fax 27 11 726 1692
More information about the incom-l
mailing list